Utah · statute

Utah AI Policy Act: what it requires, and the records to keep

Utah's Act requires businesses to disclose generative AI use when a person clearly asks, and requires licensed professionals to disclose it up front in high-risk interactions. It also bars blaming AI as a defence to consumer-protection violations and created an Office of AI Policy with a regulatory learning lab.

Legal forceBinding law
StatusIn force
Applies from2024-05-01 (current disclosure rules from 2025-05-07)
JurisdictionUtah
Checked21 Oct 2026

01 / What it requires

What Utah AI Policy Act requires

Suppliers using generative AI to interact with people in consumer transactions, and individuals providing services in occupations licensed or certified through the Utah Department of Commerce.

  1. 01Tell an individual they are interacting with generative AI, not a human, when they clearly and unambiguously ask.
  2. 02Regulated occupations: prominently disclose generative AI use in high-risk interactions, verbally at the start or in writing before.
  3. 03High-risk interactions include collecting health, financial or biometric data, or giving financial, legal, medical or mental health advice.
  4. 04Regulated occupations: meet all professional rules when providing services through generative AI.
  5. 05Do not rely on generative AI having made the statement or act as a defence to consumer-protection violations.

02 / AI work

Where it touches AI work

Applies to generative AI that simulates human conversation by text, audio or visual means. A safe harbour protects businesses whose AI clearly discloses at the outset and throughout that it is AI.

03 / Dates

The dates that matter

1 May 2024

SB 149 takes effect; Office of AI Policy created

25 Mar 2025

SB 332 signed, moving the Act's repeal date to 1 July 2027

7 May 2025

SB 226 disclosure rules (Chapter 75) take effect

18 Mar 2026

HB 320 Office of AI Policy Amendments signed

1 Jul 2027

Scheduled repeal of the AI Policy Act (Chapter 72)

04 / Enforcement

Who enforces it

Utah Division of Consumer Protection, with the Attorney General as counsel; administrative or court fines up to $2,500 per violation, disgorgement and injunctions; up to $5,000 per violation of an order.

05 / Records

Records an organisation keeps

What an auditor or an inquiry usually asks to see. Your obligations depend on your role and your facts.

  1. 01Chatbot scripts showing AI disclosure at the outset and throughout
  2. 02Logs of responses to users asking whether they are talking to AI
  3. 03Classification of interactions as high-risk, by service line
  4. 04Pre-interaction disclosure records for licensed-professional services

Optional evidence · where Planisphere fits

Keep a record anyone can check

When your team meets a duty, Planisphere can seal the event it reports as a receipt.

01 · Your teamRecord the event

A disclosure shown, a review signed, a model change approved: the event your system reports.

02 · PlanisphereSeal it

The event becomes a sealed receipt, dated and attributed to whoever is signed in.

03 · AnyoneCheck it

Paste the receipt into Verify. No account or key.

A record supports your compliance evidence process. It is not a legal finding or a certification. Systems that call Planisphere's gate API can also hold or refuse an action before it runs.

QUESTIONS

The questions that come next

Does Utah require AI disclosure?+

Yes, in two situations. Since 7 May 2025, under SB 226, a business using generative AI to interact with a person in a consumer transaction must disclose that the person is dealing with AI, not a human, if the person clearly and unambiguously asks. People in occupations regulated by the Utah Department of Commerce must disclose proactively in high-risk interactions, such as collecting health, financial or biometric data or giving medical, legal, financial or mental health advice. The Division of Consumer Protection can fine up to $2,500 per violation. Read the full answer

SOURCES

Go back to the source

SECONDARY

CHANGE LOG

What changed, and when

21 Oct 2026

Rebuilt from primary sources; facts checked on this date.

Related: FSMB AI / state boards · State Bar AI Opinions · SOPIPA · NYC Local Law 144 · Colorado AI Act · Texas TRAIGA