Texas TRAIGA.
The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA, HB 149), enacted 2025-06-22, takes effect 2026-01-01. The evidence record proves: A dated, recomputable behavioural record evidencing how the system actually operates
Reviewed 2026-07-08
What this is.
Use. HB 149 intent-based AI governance (eff 2026-01-01).
Register. 09 · Compliance controls — one of the 17 registers of the PLANiSPHERE corpus library.
Promise. compliance
Texas TRAIGA is enacted (or near-enacted) law in a specific jurisdiction, with a specific obligation and a specific date. Planisphere maps the obligation to an evidence record supporting the bias audit, transparency disclosure, or high-risk notice — and pins it to the section and effective date so a third party can verify it.
Answers: What does Texas TRAIGA require, by when, and what does Planisphere deliver for it?
See it work.
Planisphere measures your tool deployment against Texas TRAIGA and seals the result into a signed, Merkle-rooted evidence record. The grade recomputes on your own hardware; the model state never crosses the boundary.
What it requires.
The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA, HB 149), enacted 2025-06-22, takes effect 2026-01-01. It is an intent-based AI governance statute: it prohibits developing or deploying AI systems with the intent to unlawfully discriminate or cause certain harms, rather than imposing a prescriptive audit or impact-assessment regime. There is no mandated bias audit, but a deployer must be able to show how its system behaves to rebut an inference of prohibited intent.
What the evidence record proves.
- A dated, recomputable behavioural record evidencing how the system actually operates
- Distinctness, drift, and coherence baselines that document non-discriminatory behaviour
- Probe results usable to rebut an inference of intentional discrimination
- A sha-pinned record attachable to internal governance documentation
- Evidence supporting good-faith deployment under the statute's intent standard
What this does not prove. TRAIGA is intent-based and requires no audit, so Planisphere proves system behaviour, not the developer's or deployer's state of mind; it offers no legal advice and cannot conclusively establish the absence of prohibited intent.
Questions this answers.
The filing this law expects.
Texas TRAIGA asks for an evidence record: The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA, HB 149), enacted 2025-06-22, takes effect 2026-01-01. Read the related evidence spine product context at /evidence.
California AI Transparency reg 09 · SB 942 + AB 2013 + SB 53 + CCPA ADMT — the CA frontier/transparency stack Colorado AI Act reg 09 · SB 24-205 → SB 26-189 lineage · high-risk notice/transparency (eff 2027-01-01) EU AI Act reg 09 · risk-tiered conformity assessment + post-market monitoring (phased 2025-2027)Sibling marks. Compliance controls
For each vertical.
Texas TRAIGA for defense AI workflow
NIST AI RMF · DoW RAI · OMB M-25-21 Open the pageTexas TRAIGA for clinical AI workflow
HHS §1557 · HIPAA · FDA PCCP Open the pageTexas TRAIGA for legal AI workflow
FRE 702 · ABA Model Rules Open the pageTexas TRAIGA for tutor and grader workflow
Title VI · FERPA · §504 / IDEA Open the pageSee the record Texas TRAIGA asks for.
The console shows the evidence; the docs show the endpoints; the briefing shows what the product does and does not claim.