Does Texas require an AI impact assessment?

No — TRAIGA deliberately departs from the impact-assessment model used in some other states, taking an intent-based approach that targets prohibited uses and knowing or intentional harms rather than imposing a blanket pre-deployment impact-assessment mandate.…

register 09 · Compliance pins· Texas TRAIGA
01 ·

Answer.

Named jurisdictional law · Texas TRAIGA.

No — TRAIGA deliberately departs from the impact-assessment model used in some other states, taking an intent-based approach that targets prohibited uses and knowing or intentional harms rather than imposing a blanket pre-deployment impact-assessment mandate. That makes it lighter-touch on documentation but sharper on prohibited conduct. Planisphere supplies behaviour evidence useful for governance regardless of model; it does not advise on whether TRAIGA requires a particular assessment, which is a legal question.

Cite-anchor: Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), HB 149 · Tex. HB 149 (89th Leg., 2025); eff. 2026-01-01

02 ·

The mark behind the answer.

Texas TRAIGA is enacted (or near-enacted) law in a specific jurisdiction, with a specific obligation and a specific date…

HB 149 intent-based AI governance (eff 2026-01-01).

→ Full reference for Texas TRAIGA

03 ·

More on Texas TRAIGA.

Other questions this mark answers.

Try Texas TRAIGA with a free test key.

Start with the free sandbox. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.

API ·

When Texas TRAIGA asks for proof, hand over records — not assurances.

record the duty · seal the receipt · verify offline

Planisphere records each duty event — an output marked, a disclosure shown, a review made — and seals it into a receipt that verifies offline against our published keys. You send hashes, never content. A record is evidence a third party can check; it is not a certification and not a legal determination.

See how a record is checked