What does the California / Florida / Texas bar say about AI?

Each has issued guidance in the same spirit: California's practical guidance stresses confidentiality and competent supervision of generative AI; Florida's ethics opinion addresses confidentiality, oversight, fees, and advertising; Texas guidance emphasizes…

register 09 · Compliance pins· State Bar AI Opinions
01 ·

Answer.

Evidence / professional-responsibility rule · State Bar AI Opinions.

Each has issued guidance in the same spirit: California's practical guidance stresses confidentiality and competent supervision of generative AI; Florida's ethics opinion addresses confidentiality, oversight, fees, and advertising; Texas guidance emphasizes competence, confidentiality, and verifying output. All reinforce that the lawyer remains responsible. For the controlling language you should read each bar's current opinion directly; Planisphere measures tool behaviour and does not give legal advice.

02 ·

The mark behind the answer.

State Bar AI Opinions sets the bar an AI output must clear before a tribunal or a client relies on it — reliability, can…

CA · FL · TX · NY · PA · NC bar gen-AI ethics guidance roundup.

→ Full reference for State Bar AI Opinions

Try State Bar AI Opinions with a free test key.

Start with the free sandbox. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.

API ·

When State Bar AI Opinions asks for proof, hand over records — not assurances.

record the duty · seal the receipt · verify offline

Planisphere records each duty event — an output marked, a disclosure shown, a review made — and seals it into a receipt that verifies offline against our published keys. You send hashes, never content. A record is evidence a third party can check; it is not a certification and not a legal determination.

See how a record is checked · See the law Toolkit →