How does a GC evaluate an outside AI legal-tech vendor?

A general counsel typically assesses the vendor's confidentiality and data-use terms, whether inputs train the model, security posture, the tool's reliability and error profile, and how the firm will supervise and verify output — mapping to the competence,…

register 09 · Compliance pins· State Bar AI Opinions
01 ·

Answer.

Evidence / professional-responsibility rule · State Bar AI Opinions.

A general counsel typically assesses the vendor's confidentiality and data-use terms, whether inputs train the model, security posture, the tool's reliability and error profile, and how the firm will supervise and verify output — mapping to the competence, confidentiality, and supervision duties in Opinion 512 and state guidance. Independent, reproducible evidence of the tool's behaviour strengthens that diligence. Planisphere supplies that behaviour-and-drift evidence; it does not select the vendor or give legal advice.

02 ·

The mark behind the answer.

State Bar AI Opinions sets the bar an AI output must clear before a tribunal or a client relies on it — reliability, can…

CA · FL · TX · NY · PA · NC bar gen-AI ethics guidance roundup.

→ Full reference for State Bar AI Opinions

Prepare evidence for State Bar AI Opinions review.

First evidence record within 21 days of access · re-runs in a single business day. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.