Who is liable when a physician follows an AI recommendation that causes harm?

Under current FSMB guidance and state medical-board policy, the physician retains ultimate responsibility for patient care — using an AI tool does not transfer the standard-of-care obligation, so a physician who follows a recommendation remains accountable…

register 09 · Compliance pins· FSMB AI / state boards
01 ·

Answer.

Healthcare regulation · FSMB AI / state boards.

Under current FSMB guidance and state medical-board policy, the physician retains ultimate responsibility for patient care — using an AI tool does not transfer the standard-of-care obligation, so a physician who follows a recommendation remains accountable for the clinical judgment, with potential vendor liability a separate question. The tool informs, the physician decides. Planisphere can evidence how the AI tool behaves, which supports the physician's diligence, but it assigns no liability and provides no legal advice.

02 ·

The mark behind the answer.

FSMB AI / state boards can require evidence around clinical workflows, ePHI boundaries, change control, or patient-impac…

physician-responsibility · standard-of-care · state medical-board AI policy.

→ Full reference for FSMB AI / state boards

Try FSMB AI / state boards with a free test key.

Start with the free sandbox. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.

API ·

When FSMB AI / state boards asks for proof, hand over records — not assurances.

record the duty · seal the receipt · verify offline

Planisphere records each duty event — an output marked, a disclosure shown, a review made — and seals it into a receipt that verifies offline against our published keys. You send hashes, never content. A record is evidence a third party can check; it is not a certification and not a legal determination.

See how a record is checked