What do state medical boards say about using AI in clinical decisions?
State medical boards, guided by FSMB's 2024 framework, generally treat AI as a tool that must not displace the physician's independent judgment: the physician stays responsible for the standard of care, must understand the tool's limits, and in some states…
Answer.
State medical boards, guided by FSMB's 2024 framework, generally treat AI as a tool that must not displace the physician's independent judgment: the physician stays responsible for the standard of care, must understand the tool's limits, and in some states must address patient transparency. Specifics vary by state. Planisphere supplies model-behaviour evidence supporting a physician's understanding of the tool; it does not substitute for board guidance or legal advice in a given state.
The mark behind the answer.
physician-responsibility · standard-of-care · state medical-board AI policy.
More on FSMB AI / state boards.
Prepare evidence for FSMB AI / state boards review.
First evidence record within 21 days of access · re-runs in a single business day. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.