01 ·
Clinical AI workflow vs Legal AI workflow.
Two buyer workflows · one evidence system · different review cover sheet
Use this when a buyer is comparing review paths. Planisphere keeps the same spine in both cases: map the workflow, run the harness, and return evidence compliance can inspect.
02 ·
Side-by-side.
Fleet · regulators · audience · pin count
MarkMedicine-board — Clinical AI workflow
vs
Law-board — Legal AI workflow
vs
Law-board — Legal AI workflow
Fleet under measurementClinical AI workflow: clinical decision support, ambient documentation, utilization-management models, predictive DSI
Legal AI workflow: legal-research, drafting, citation-faithfulness, contract-review AI
Legal AI workflow: legal-research, drafting, citation-faithfulness, contract-review AI
Regulators overlaidClinical AI workflow: HHS §1557, HIPAA-out-of-scope by construction, FDA SaMD / PCCP, ONC HTI-1 predictive-DSI transparency, CMS utilization rules
Legal AI workflow: FRE 702, proposed FRE 707, ABA Model Rules 1.1 / 1.6 / 3.3 / 5.1–5.3, ABA Formal Opinion 512
Legal AI workflow: FRE 702, proposed FRE 707, ABA Model Rules 1.1 / 1.6 / 3.3 / 5.1–5.3, ABA Formal Opinion 512
AudienceClinical AI workflow: health systems, clinical-AI committees, hospital compliance, payor IT
Legal AI workflow: AmLaw firms, in-house general counsel, court chambers, litigation support
Legal AI workflow: AmLaw firms, in-house general counsel, court chambers, litigation support
Compliance pins (register 09)24 per workflow, drawn from the same register 09 set; the per-vertical filter at /corpus/for/medicine vs /corpus/for/law shows the pin set framed for each. (Page slug == corpus vertical slug after soc-716 H1–H3 canonical rename.)
Shared evidence systemSeven Astrolabe measurement-engine evidence-record fields. See /schema for the matrix.
03 ·
Which review path fits the buyer.
A one-line decision pin per workflow
Clinical AI workflow. Pick when the buyer is a health system or payor and the question is §1557 algorithmic-non-discrimination, FDA SaMD lifecycle, or ONC HTI-1 DSI transparency.
Legal AI workflow. Pick when the buyer is a firm GC or court and the question is admissibility (FRE 702 / 707), confidentiality (ABA 1.6), or competence (ABA 1.1 / Formal 512).
If the buyer's question spans both domains — e.g. a defense-medical research office, a school-district legal opinion — the answer is one scoped evidence review with two cover sheets. The method is shared; the compliance audience and review boundary change.
——— Clinical AI workflow vs Legal AI workflow · one evidence system · two cover sheets ———