01 ·
Defense AI workflow vs Legal AI workflow.
Two buyer workflows · one evidence system · different review cover sheet
Use this when a buyer is comparing review paths. Planisphere keeps the same spine in both cases: map the workflow, run the harness, and return evidence compliance can inspect.
02 ·
Side-by-side.
Fleet · regulators · audience · pin count
MarkWar-board — Defense AI workflow
vs
Law-board — Legal AI workflow
vs
Law-board — Legal AI workflow
Fleet under measurementDefense AI workflow: battlestaff, intel cells, mission planning, and decision-support agents
Legal AI workflow: legal-research, drafting, citation-faithfulness, contract-review AI
Legal AI workflow: legal-research, drafting, citation-faithfulness, contract-review AI
Regulators overlaidDefense AI workflow: NIST AI RMF, OMB M-25-21/22, DoW RAI S&IP, CMMC evidence questions, DoW impact-level review planning
Legal AI workflow: FRE 702, proposed FRE 707, ABA Model Rules 1.1 / 1.6 / 3.3 / 5.1–5.3, ABA Formal Opinion 512
Legal AI workflow: FRE 702, proposed FRE 707, ABA Model Rules 1.1 / 1.6 / 3.3 / 5.1–5.3, ABA Formal Opinion 512
AudienceDefense AI workflow: program offices, ATO-package owners, JADC2 staff
Legal AI workflow: AmLaw firms, in-house general counsel, court chambers, litigation support
Legal AI workflow: AmLaw firms, in-house general counsel, court chambers, litigation support
Compliance pins (register 09)24 per workflow, drawn from the same register 09 set; the per-vertical filter at /corpus/for/defense vs /corpus/for/law shows the pin set framed for each. (Page slug == corpus vertical slug after soc-716 H1–H3 canonical rename.)
Shared evidence systemSeven Astrolabe measurement-engine evidence-record fields. See /schema for the matrix.
03 ·
Which review path fits the buyer.
A one-line decision pin per workflow
Defense AI workflow. Pick when the buyer is a U.S. defense program office and the evidence must support authorization, CMMC, or impact-level review.
Legal AI workflow. Pick when the buyer is a firm GC or court and the question is admissibility (FRE 702 / 707), confidentiality (ABA 1.6), or competence (ABA 1.1 / Formal 512).
If the buyer's question spans both domains — e.g. a defense-medical research office, a school-district legal opinion — the answer is one scoped evidence review with two cover sheets. The method is shared; the compliance audience and review boundary change.
——— Defense AI workflow vs Legal AI workflow · one evidence system · two cover sheets ———