Compare
SLSA v1.0 vs SSDF SP 800-218: how they differ, side by side
How SLSA v1.0 and SSDF SP 800-218 differ: what each is, who owes it, when it applies and who enforces it.
01 / Side by side
SLSA v1.0 and SSDF SP 800-218, side by side
| SLSA v1.0 | SSDF SP 800-218 | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | technical specification | federal standard |
| Jurisdiction | International | United States (federal) |
| Legal force | Voluntary framework | Voluntary framework; no government-wide attestation since Jan 2026 |
| Status | Superseded | Published standard |
| Applies from | 19 Apr 2023 | 3 Feb 2022 |
| Who owes it | Software producers and build platform operators that want to show build integrity, and consumers verifying artifacts. | Software producers of all kinds, and in particular vendors whose software is used by US federal agencies. |
| Enforcement | None; voluntary. | None directly; voluntary. Agencies may require SSDF practices or an attestation by contract, and false contract representations can create False Claims Act exposure. |
02 / SLSA v1.0
What SLSA v1.0 requires
Build provenance can apply to model training or packaging pipelines that produce AI artifacts, but SLSA does not address models or data specifically.
- 01Build L1: follow a consistent build process and generate and distribute provenance describing platform, process and top-level inputs.
- 02Build L2: run builds on a hosted build platform that signs the provenance.
- 03Build L3: use a hardened platform that isolates runs and keeps signing secrets from user-defined build steps.
- 04Consumers verify provenance against expected builder, source and parameters before use.
03 / SSDF SP 800-218
What SSDF SP 800-218 requires
SP 800-218A (July 2024) is an SSDF community profile for generative AI and dual-use foundation models; it adds tasks such as protecting training data and model weights and tracking model provenance.
- 01Define security requirements, roles, training and toolchains for software development (PO).
- 02Protect code, releases and provenance data from tampering and unauthorized access (PS).
- 03Design securely, review and test code, and configure software secure by default (PW).
- 04Identify, analyze and fix vulnerabilities and their root causes after release (RV).
- 05Apply practices on a risk basis and document how each is met.
Optional evidence · where Planisphere fits
Keep a record anyone can check
When your team meets a duty, Planisphere can seal the event it reports as a receipt.
A disclosure shown, a review signed, a model change approved: the event your system reports.
The event becomes a sealed receipt, dated and attributed to whoever is signed in.
Paste the receipt into Verify. No account or key.
A record supports your compliance evidence process. It is not a legal finding or a certification. Systems that call Planisphere's gate API can also hold or refuse an action before it runs.
SOURCES
Go back to the source
OpenSSF SLSA project
OpenSSF SLSA project
OpenSSF SLSA project
RELATED
Related: SLSA v1.0: the full guide · SSDF SP 800-218: the full guide · SSDF SP 800-218 vs SLSA v1.0 · All comparisons