Compare
SBOM vs SLSA v1.0: how they differ, side by side
How SBOM and SLSA v1.0 differ: what each is, who owes it, when it applies and who enforces it.
01 / Side by side
SBOM and SLSA v1.0, side by side
| SBOM | SLSA v1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | guidance | technical specification |
| Jurisdiction | United States (federal) | International |
| Legal force | Guidance; binding only where a contract or sector rule requires it | Voluntary framework |
| Status | Published standard | Superseded |
| Applies from | 12 Jul 2021 | 19 Apr 2023 |
| Who owes it | Software producers selling to federal agencies or regulated buyers, and organizations that procure or operate software. | Software producers and build platform operators that want to show build integrity, and consumers verifying artifacts. |
| Enforcement | No general penalty. Federal agencies may require SBOMs by contract (OMB M-26-05); other mandates come from sector rules and foreign law. | None; voluntary. |
02 / SBOM
What SBOM requires
The 2026 baseline expressly covers AI software but adds no AI-specific fields; CISA and G7 partners issued separate AI SBOM minimum elements in May 2026 as a supplement.
- 01Produce SBOMs with the 17 minimum data fields, including component producer, version, identifiers, hash value and license.
- 02Record SBOM author, timestamp, tool name and version, and generation context (lifecycle phase).
- 03Sign the SBOM so recipients can confirm it is unaltered (SBOM Author Signature).
- 04Use machine-processable formats such as SPDX or CycloneDX and update the SBOM when components change.
- 05For federal cloud contracts with SBOM terms, provide an SBOM of the runtime production environment on request.
03 / SLSA v1.0
What SLSA v1.0 requires
Build provenance can apply to model training or packaging pipelines that produce AI artifacts, but SLSA does not address models or data specifically.
- 01Build L1: follow a consistent build process and generate and distribute provenance describing platform, process and top-level inputs.
- 02Build L2: run builds on a hosted build platform that signs the provenance.
- 03Build L3: use a hardened platform that isolates runs and keeps signing secrets from user-defined build steps.
- 04Consumers verify provenance against expected builder, source and parameters before use.
Optional evidence · where Planisphere fits
Keep a record anyone can check
When your team meets a duty, Planisphere can seal the event it reports as a receipt.
A disclosure shown, a review signed, a model change approved: the event your system reports.
The event becomes a sealed receipt, dated and attributed to whoever is signed in.
Paste the receipt into Verify. No account or key.
A record supports your compliance evidence process. It is not a legal finding or a certification. Systems that call Planisphere's gate API can also hold or refuse an action before it runs.
SOURCES
Go back to the source
CISA, NSA, FBI and international partners (hosted by FBI IC3)
Office of Management and Budget
OpenSSF SLSA project
OpenSSF SLSA project
OpenSSF SLSA project
RELATED
Related: SBOM: the full guide · SLSA v1.0: the full guide · SLSA v1.0 vs SBOM · All comparisons