What audit evidence does a district CIO need before buying an AI grader?
A district CIO typically wants evidence the AI grader performs consistently and fairly across student cohorts, documentation of its validation and limits, data-privacy assurances, and a way to monitor it after deployment — enough to satisfy nondiscrimination…
Answer.
A district CIO typically wants evidence the AI grader performs consistently and fairly across student cohorts, documentation of its validation and limits, data-privacy assurances, and a way to monitor it after deployment — enough to satisfy nondiscrimination (Title VI/§504) and procurement diligence. Independent, reproducible measurement is the strongest such evidence. Planisphere produces a cohort-fairness and drift record without ingesting student PII; it informs the purchase decision, it does not certify the product.
The mark behind the answer.
automated proctoring/grading · §504 disparate-impact across cohorts.
More on Proctoring Fairness.
Prepare evidence for Proctoring Fairness review.
First evidence record within 21 days of access · re-runs in a single business day. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.