What's the difference between OMB M-25-21/22 and EO 14179?

OMB M-25-21/22 (federal AI risk-management + acquisition) and EO 14179 (Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI (Jan 2025)) are distinct cite-anchors. Planisphere's evidence record maps both controls for evaluator review; sufficiency remains evaluator-specific.

Do I need both OMB M-25-21/22 and EO 14179 in my record?

If both apply to your tool deployment, yes — and the record maps both controls in one artifact at no extra cost.

Comparison · register 09

OMB M-25-21/22 vs EO 14179.

Two regulatory anchors. Planisphere's evidence record maps both controls. This page is the comparison query's canonical destination.

Scope an AI workflow review OMB M-25-21/22 brief EO 14179 brief

01 ·

When to lead with OMB M-25-21/22.

Use OMB M-25-21/22 as the primary anchor when the evaluator is shaped this way.

Audience. federal AI risk-management + acquisition.

Shape. memorandum · folded corner.

Where it lives in the record. The OMB M-25-21/22 cite-anchor pins next to every artifact in ATTESTATION.json. See the OMB M-25-21/22 brief for the field-level mapping.

02 ·

When to lead with EO 14179.

Use EO 14179 as the primary anchor when the evaluator is shaped this way.

Audience. Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI (Jan 2025).

Shape. executive scroll · brass seal.

Where it lives in the record. The EO 14179 cite-anchor pins next to every artifact in ATTESTATION.json. See the EO 14179 brief for the field-level mapping.

03 ·

Both at once.

The evidence record maps both anchors for review — you don't have to pick.

Planisphere's evidence record is multi-control by construction. OMB M-25-21/22 and EO 14179 are both keys in the record's requirement list; the same SHA-pinned, Merkle-rooted artifact gives both evaluators a shared review record.

The requirement list is open — add any standard the regulator names. See the full compliance-control register.

Compare AI options for compliance