Compare
ISO/IEC 42001 vs DoW RAI S&IP: how they differ, side by side
How ISO/IEC 42001 and DoW RAI S&IP differ: what each is, who owes it, when it applies and who enforces it.
01 / Side by side
ISO/IEC 42001 and DoW RAI S&IP, side by side
| ISO/IEC 42001 | DoW RAI S&IP | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | international standard | guidance |
| Jurisdiction | International | United States (federal) |
| Legal force | Voluntary standard; certifiable by accredited bodies | Internal departmental strategy; directs DoD components, no direct duty on contractors |
| Status | Published standard | In force |
| Applies from | 18 Dec 2023 | June 2022 |
| Who owes it | Any organization that provides or uses products or services that use AI systems, regardless of size, type or nature, if it chooses to adopt or certify. | DoD (styled Department of War since September 2025) components and the Chief Digital and AI Officer (CDAO), which leads Responsible AI implementation. |
| Enforcement | None; voluntary. Accredited certification bodies audit and certify; customers may require certification by contract. | Internal DoD oversight by CDAO and component leadership; GAO and Congress review implementation. No penalties. |
02 / ISO/IEC 42001
What ISO/IEC 42001 requires
AI-specific. It is a governance system for how an organization develops, provides or uses AI systems, not a technical test of any one model.
- 01Define the AIMS scope, the organization's role toward AI (e.g. provider, user) and relevant interested parties.
- 02Top management sets an AI policy, AI objectives and assigns roles and responsibilities.
- 03Run AI risk assessments, AI risk treatment and AI system impact assessments, and record a Statement of Applicability.
- 04Plan, operate and control AI processes, applying the Annex A controls selected in risk treatment.
- 05Monitor, measure and evaluate AIMS performance through internal audits and management reviews.
- 06Correct nonconformities and continually improve the AIMS.
03 / DoW RAI S&IP
What DoW RAI S&IP requires
AI-specific. It is DoD's main plan for putting AI ethics into practice for AI systems the department builds, buys and fields.
- 01Apply the DoD AI Ethical Principles (responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable, governable) across the AI lifecycle.
- 02Designate Responsible AI leads in each DoD component and resource the lines of effort assigned to that component.
- 03CDAO provides department-wide Responsible AI guidance, tools and coordination, and tracks implementation progress.
- 04Build warfighter trust through test and evaluation, assessment and monitoring of AI capabilities.
- 05Integrate Responsible AI into AI product development and acquisition, including requirements validation.
- 06Develop metrics for Responsible AI adoption and report progress to the CDAO governing council.
Optional evidence · where Planisphere fits
Keep a record anyone can check
When your team meets a duty, Planisphere can seal the event it reports as a receipt.
A disclosure shown, a review signed, a model change approved: the event your system reports.
The event becomes a sealed receipt, dated and attributed to whoever is signed in.
Paste the receipt into Verify. No account or key.
A record supports your compliance evidence process. It is not a legal finding or a certification. Systems that call Planisphere's gate API can also hold or refuse an action before it runs.
SOURCES
Go back to the source
IEC Webstore (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42)
International Organization for Standardization
International Organization for Standardization
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. Government Accountability Office
Chief Digital and AI Office, hosted by Tradewinds
RELATED
Related: ISO/IEC 42001: the full guide · DoW RAI S&IP: the full guide · DoW RAI S&IP vs ISO/IEC 42001 · All comparisons