Can an audit record prove my AI tool is reliable enough for court?
An audit record is strong corroborating evidence — it documents reproducible performance and is tamper-evident — but "reliable enough for court" is a legal determination a judge makes under FRE 702 and (if adopted) FRE 707, weighing the record alongside the…
Answer.
An audit record is strong corroborating evidence — it documents reproducible performance and is tamper-evident — but "reliable enough for court" is a legal determination a judge makes under FRE 702 and (if adopted) FRE 707, weighing the record alongside the rest of the foundation. It supports the argument; it does not decide it. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible record; it does not certify admissibility or give legal advice.
The mark behind the answer.
machine-generated evidence · Rule-702-grade reliability for AI output (PROPOSED).
More on FRE 707 (proposed).
Prepare evidence for FRE 707 (proposed) review.
First evidence record within 21 days of access · re-runs in a single business day. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.