Does AI output have to meet FRE 702 reliability standards?

When AI output is offered through an expert, FRE 702 already governs the expert's reliance on it, and the 2023 amendment sharpened the court's gatekeeping over whether the opinion reliably applies its methods. Proposed FRE 707 would extend 702-style…

register 09 · Compliance pins· FRE 702
01 ·

Answer.

Evidence / professional-responsibility rule · FRE 702.

When AI output is offered through an expert, FRE 702 already governs the expert's reliance on it, and the 2023 amendment sharpened the court's gatekeeping over whether the opinion reliably applies its methods. Proposed FRE 707 would extend 702-style reliability scrutiny to machine output offered without an expert. Either way, reliability is the test. Planisphere's reproducible measurement helps meet that standard; it does not itself qualify as expert testimony or provide legal advice.

02 ·

The mark behind the answer.

FRE 702 sets the bar an AI output must clear before a tribunal or a client relies on it — reliability, candor, competenc…

expert testimony · reliability gatekeeping.

→ Full reference for FRE 702

03 ·

More on FRE 702.

Other questions this mark answers.

Try FRE 702 with a free test key.

Start with the free sandbox. Planisphere measures model behaviour and emits a reproducible, sha-pinned record — it does not certify, file, or give legal advice.

API ·

When FRE 702 asks for proof, hand over records — not assurances.

record the duty · seal the receipt · verify offline

Planisphere records each duty event — an output marked, a disclosure shown, a review made — and seals it into a receipt that verifies offline against our published keys. You send hashes, never content. A record is evidence a third party can check; it is not a certification and not a legal determination.

See how a record is checked · See the law Toolkit →