Compare
FERPA vs Title VI: how they differ, side by side
How FERPA and Title VI differ: what each is, who owes it, when it applies and who enforces it.
01 / Side by side
FERPA and Title VI, side by side
| FERPA | Title VI | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | statute | statute |
| Jurisdiction | United States (federal) | United States (federal) |
| Legal force | Binding on schools receiving U.S. Department of Education funds | Binding on recipients of federal financial assistance |
| Status | In force | In force |
| Applies from | 19 Nov 1974 | 2 Jul 1964 |
| Who owes it | Educational agencies and institutions that receive U.S. Department of Education funds, and outside parties that receive education records from them. | Any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, including public schools and most colleges. |
| Enforcement | U.S. Department of Education Student Privacy Policy Office; the ultimate remedy is withholding federal funds after voluntary compliance fails. No private right of action (Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 2002). | ED Office for Civil Rights (DOJ assisting investigations since June 2026) and DOJ; fund termination after hearing or referral for litigation. Private suits only for intentional discrimination (Alexander v. Sandoval, 2001). |
02 / FERPA
What FERPA requires
AI tutors, grading tools and analytics platforms that receive student records usually rely on the school-official exception, so the school must keep direct control over how the vendor uses the data. A vendor reusing records for its own purposes, such as training general models, falls outside the authorized purpose unless consent or another exception covers it.
- 01Get written consent before disclosing personally identifiable information from education records, unless a listed exception applies.
- 02Treat an AI vendor as a 'school official' only if it performs an institutional function, under direct school control over use and maintenance of records.
- 03Limit vendors' use and redisclosure of records to the authorized purpose (34 CFR 99.33).
- 04Use reasonable methods so school officials, including vendors, access only records with a legitimate educational interest.
- 05Publish an annual notice of rights stating the criteria for who counts as a school official and legitimate educational interest.
03 / Title VI
What Title VI requires
AI used in admissions, discipline, risk scoring, monitoring or language services is covered where it treats students differently by race, color or national origin. Since ED and DOJ removed disparate-impact rules, a neutral AI tool with unequal results is no longer a Title VI violation under ED's regulations without proof of intent.
- 01Do not use AI tools that treat students differently on the basis of race, color or national origin.
- 02Respond to known race or national-origin harassment, including AI-generated content such as deepfakes targeting students.
- 03Give the required assurance of Title VI compliance as a condition of federal funding (34 CFR 100.4).
- 04Keep compliance records and give OCR access to them on request (34 CFR 100.6).
Optional evidence · where Planisphere fits
Keep a record anyone can check
When your team meets a duty, Planisphere can seal the event it reports as a receipt.
A disclosure shown, a review signed, a model change approved: the event your system reports.
The event becomes a sealed receipt, dated and attributed to whoever is signed in.
Paste the receipt into Verify. No account or key.
A record supports your compliance evidence process. It is not a legal finding or a certification. Systems that call Planisphere's gate API can also hold or refuse an action before it runs.
SOURCES
Go back to the source
Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
U.S. Department of Education, Privacy Technical Assistance Center
Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
Federal Register via GovInfo
RELATED
Related: FERPA: the full guide · Title VI: the full guide · Title VI vs FERPA · All comparisons